Argon radiometric dating

Posted by / 03-Apr-2020 20:28

Argon radiometric dating

If these dates are correct, this calls the Biblical account of a recent creation of life into question.After study and discussion of this question, I now believe that the claimed accuracy of radiometric dating methods is a result of a great misunderstanding of the data, and that the various methods hardly ever agree with each other, and often do not agree with the assumed ages of the rocks in which they are found.Young rocks have low levels of The rock samples are crushed, in clean equipment, to a size that preserves whole grains of the mineral to be dated, then sieved to help concentrate these grains of the target mineral.The selected size fraction is cleaned in ultrasound and acid baths, then gently oven-dried.What simplifies things is that potassium is a reactive metal and argon is an inert gas: Potassium is always tightly locked up in minerals whereas argon is not part of any minerals. So assuming that no air gets into a mineral grain when it first forms, it has zero argon content.

The key is to put the mineral sample in a neutron beam, which converts potassium-39 into argon-39.Also, the cheaper K-Ar method can be used for screening or reconnaissance purposes, saving Ar-Ar for the most demanding or interesting problems.These dating methods have been under constant improvement for more than 50 years.At the start, let me clarify that my main concern is not the age of the earth, the moon, or the solar system, but rather the age of life, that is, how long has life existed on earth.Many dating methods seem to give about the same ages on meteorites.

argon radiometric dating-79argon radiometric dating-79argon radiometric dating-6